Tamko Roofing Shingles Lawsuit

Class action lawsuits have been filed against tamko over the company s heritage fiberglass roofing shingles.

Tamko roofing shingles lawsuit. To prevent shrinkage the roof membrane and shingles must be properly installed and be routinely inspected. Stahl s roof needs 34 squares. Consumers in california colorado connecticut florida illinois and kentucky have filed class action lawsuits against the company claiming tamko s shingles are plagued by design and or. Tamko defective roof shingles class action lawsuit this lawsuit alleges that tamko building products inc.

However the roof membrane can shrink and cause cracking crazing splitting and blistering which can lead to leaks and other problems. A check for 100 and a certificate for 26 squares of roofing. Although tamko established warranty periods of up to 50 years for the shingles the suits claim that the roofing company never tested how long the shingles would last and has. Roofing experts at tamko explain poorly installed roofing can lead to a lawsuit.

Tamko agreed the shingles were defective and it offered a settlement package. Tamko laminated asphalt shingles lawsuit note. Berger montague has filed a lawsuit against tamko alleging that their heritage fiberglass roofing shingles are defective. The suits allege that the shingles are plagued by design flaws that result in cracking curling deterioration blistering degranulation and other problems that can result in property damage.

Defective tamko architectural shingles parker waichman llp is investigating legal claims for a potential class action lawsuit on behalf of consumers who purchased tamko laminated asphalt architectural roofing shingles. Some have claimed that tamko laminated asphalt shingles may not be as high quality as the manufacturer has claimed. The suit filed in 2014 by a texas county man lee hobbs and by jonesburg united methodist church located in montgomery county alleged tamko sold defective shingles that failed before their. Tamko manufactured and sold defective roof shingles that failed to perform according to advertised product warranties in violation of california consumer protection laws.

The lawsuit claims that tamko sold consumers a faulty product that cracks curls deteriorates and blisters in addition to other problems that result in property damage. Consumers who have installed the tamko laminated asphalt shingles primarily in the heritage series have complained of defects.